Tagged: literacy Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • nmw 15:55:27 on 2016/07/07 Permalink
    Tags: literacy, online publishing, , , , , web publishing   

    Arguments for + against Proprietary Publishing Platforms 


    Warning: preg_match_all(): Compilation failed: invalid range in character class at offset 7 in /homepages/23/d339537987/htdocs/ec/wp-content/themes/p2/inc/mentions.php on line 77

    Via Ma.tt: 🙂

    Here are just few other considerations for any proprietary platform:

    Can your content be easily exported from the platform if you decide to stop using it, or if they decide to pivot?
    Can you collect email subscribers, and can they be easily exported from the platform should you decide to move?
    Can you syndicate your content, in full, via feeds like RSS?
    Can you dictate the terms of when your followers see your content, or are you subject to the whims of algorithmic surfacing?
    When a visitor comes to your site, is your name or brand the hero? Or is it the platform’s brand?
    Do you have control over the comments section and who gets a voice in your world?

    What to Consider When the Platforms Show Up with Money

     
  • nmw 11:26:52 on 2014/06/04 Permalink
    Tags: brand, branding, , container, , espionage, externalities, externality, governance, government, illiteracy, industrial espionage, , language, literacy, privacy, , , spy, spyware, trademark, trademarks, , Wisdom of the Language, World-Wide Web   

    “As long as the secret courts are making sure the secret police obey the secret laws, our democracy is safe” 


    Warning: preg_match_all(): Compilation failed: invalid range in character class at offset 7 in /homepages/23/d339537987/htdocs/ec/wp-content/themes/p2/inc/mentions.php on line 77

    That quote is from a wonderful and entertaining presentation recommended by Matt Mullenweg. Some more “quoteworthy” quotes:

    • The only way to keep user information safe is not to store it.
    • These are all situations where users who were rigorous about keeping their online and real identity separate found themselves kneecapped by a service that suddenly violated its promise of privacy.

    However, the conclusion is unfortunately weak. I would call this problem “Schrödinger’s Web”: You cannot measure, assess, or correct the failing vitality of the Web on the level of content — you can only do this at the level of the container… and IMHO the problem at the container level is mostly down to the widespread illiteracy among users (which providers such as Google and Facebook actually aim to exploit). My campaign slogan for a better fix (or rather against this crappy fix) would be: Don’t even attempt to solve externalities from “thinking inside the box”.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel