Tagged: proprietary Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • nmw 14:42:28 on 2015/01/26 Permalink
    Tags: capital, CMS, code, coding, content management system, developer, developers, development, engineer, engineering, engineers, fund, funding, funds, money, , platform, platforms, program, programmer, programming, proprietary, resources, software, venture capital   

    A Great Concept for a News Organization without a Good Technology Story would have a Very Hard Time Raising Money at All 

    Warning: preg_match_all(): Compilation failed: invalid range in character class at offset 7 in /homepages/23/d339537987/htdocs/ec/wp-content/themes/p2/inc/mentions.php on line 77

    Any news organization, from startups to conglomerates and everyone in between, will inevitably plant their expectations for themselves into their choice of platform, so the decision must be undertaken with clear eyes about what can and can’t be accomplished. If your mission is outlier-or-bust and you need venture money to get there, do what you must. But otherwise, think long and hard before turning down that road — your culture is far more important than your technology, and you could put it at great risk by striking out on your own.


  • nmw 11:26:52 on 2014/06/04 Permalink
    Tags: brand, branding, , container, , espionage, externalities, externality, governance, government, illiteracy, industrial espionage, , language, , privacy, proprietary, , spy, spyware, trademark, trademarks, , Wisdom of the Language, World-Wide Web   

    “As long as the secret courts are making sure the secret police obey the secret laws, our democracy is safe” 

    Warning: preg_match_all(): Compilation failed: invalid range in character class at offset 7 in /homepages/23/d339537987/htdocs/ec/wp-content/themes/p2/inc/mentions.php on line 77

    That quote is from a wonderful and entertaining presentation recommended by Matt Mullenweg. Some more “quoteworthy” quotes:

    • The only way to keep user information safe is not to store it.
    • These are all situations where users who were rigorous about keeping their online and real identity separate found themselves kneecapped by a service that suddenly violated its promise of privacy.

    However, the conclusion is unfortunately weak. I would call this problem “Schrödinger’s Web”: You cannot measure, assess, or correct the failing vitality of the Web on the level of content — you can only do this at the level of the container… and IMHO the problem at the container level is mostly down to the widespread illiteracy among users (which providers such as Google and Facebook actually aim to exploit). My campaign slogan for a better fix (or rather against this crappy fix) would be: Don’t even attempt to solve externalities from “thinking inside the box”.

compose new post
next post/next comment
previous post/previous comment
show/hide comments
go to top
go to login
show/hide help